Subscribe
August 26, 2026

Article X of Michigan’s Constitution: Property

Property rights of alien residents could be reexamined if voters approve a “con-con” in November

Livonia, MI, August 11, 2026 – Article X – Property, the 13th of 15 papers in the Citizens Research Council’s constitutional convention series, examines provisions relating to public and private property.

The paper examines eminent domain, a governmental power that is among the most likely to evoke sentiments about expanded government. A constitutional convention would likely be asked to reexamine the proper balance between the government’s authority to exercise this power and property owners’ rights.

If a constitutional convention is called, delegates may also examine Section 1 and the need to continue abolishing the disabilities of coverture, a relic of common-law England that prevented a married woman from owning property, entering into contracts, keeping her own wages, or suing and being sued in her own name. Today, state and federal actions have eroded it to the point of obsolescence.

Section 6 provides that, “Aliens who are residents of this state shall enjoy the same rights and privileges in property as citizens of this state.” This provision originated in the 1850 Constitution and carried forward, with some changes in phraseology, to the 1908 and 1963 Constitutions.

In lieu of the political sentiment of some that would treat alien residents differently than U.S. citizens, it is possible that a constitutional convention might be seen as an opportunity to weaken the language in this provision to weaken the rights of alien residents.

The paper concludes that Section 2, eminent domain, is the Article X section most likely to be revised if a constitutional convention is convened. Depending on the ideological leanings of the convention delegates, attempts could be made to shift the balance between the government’s power to exercise eminent domain and property owners’ rights in either direction.

The Citizens Research Council takes no position on whether to call a constitutional convention.

###

Founded in 1916, the Citizens Research Council of Michigan works to improve government in Michigan. The organization provides factual, unbiased, independent information concerning significant issues of state and local government organization, policy, and finance. By delivery of this information to policymakers and citizens, the Research Council aims to ensure sound and rational public policy formation in Michigan. For more information, visit www.crcmich.org.

Communications Director

About The Author

Maureen McNulty-Saxton

Communications Director

Maureen is a leading public relations and communications professional with decades of experience in both the public and private sectors. She joined the Research Council as Communications Director in 2023. Before that, Maureen led strategic public relations for statewide clients on behalf of a Detroit-based PR firm. She also founded and directed PR Edge, a Lansing-based public relations firm. Maureen also served in several roles in state government, including heading the press and communications offices for the state departments of Treasury, Management and Budget, and History, Arts & Libraries. She also served as a gubernatorial campaign’s deputy campaign manager and spokeswoman. She earned her B.A. in International Relations from the University of Michigan and serves on the Board of Commissioners of LEPFA as vice chair and the Michigan Nature Association Board of Trustees.

Article X of Michigan’s Constitution: Property

Property rights of alien residents could be reexamined if voters approve a “con-con” in November

Livonia, MI, August 11, 2026 – Article X – Property, the 13th of 15 papers in the Citizens Research Council’s constitutional convention series, examines provisions relating to public and private property.

The paper examines eminent domain, a governmental power that is among the most likely to evoke sentiments about expanded government. A constitutional convention would likely be asked to reexamine the proper balance between the government’s authority to exercise this power and property owners’ rights.

If a constitutional convention is called, delegates may also examine Section 1 and the need to continue abolishing the disabilities of coverture, a relic of common-law England that prevented a married woman from owning property, entering into contracts, keeping her own wages, or suing and being sued in her own name. Today, state and federal actions have eroded it to the point of obsolescence.

Section 6 provides that, “Aliens who are residents of this state shall enjoy the same rights and privileges in property as citizens of this state.” This provision originated in the 1850 Constitution and carried forward, with some changes in phraseology, to the 1908 and 1963 Constitutions.

In lieu of the political sentiment of some that would treat alien residents differently than U.S. citizens, it is possible that a constitutional convention might be seen as an opportunity to weaken the language in this provision to weaken the rights of alien residents.

The paper concludes that Section 2, eminent domain, is the Article X section most likely to be revised if a constitutional convention is convened. Depending on the ideological leanings of the convention delegates, attempts could be made to shift the balance between the government’s power to exercise eminent domain and property owners’ rights in either direction.

The Citizens Research Council takes no position on whether to call a constitutional convention.

###

Founded in 1916, the Citizens Research Council of Michigan works to improve government in Michigan. The organization provides factual, unbiased, independent information concerning significant issues of state and local government organization, policy, and finance. By delivery of this information to policymakers and citizens, the Research Council aims to ensure sound and rational public policy formation in Michigan. For more information, visit www.crcmich.org.

  • Permission to reprint our Briefs in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the Citizens Research Council of Michigan is properly cited.

  • Recent Posts

  • Stay informed of new research published and other Citizens Research Council news.
    [ctct form="10424" show_title="false"]
    Communications Director

    About The Author

    Maureen McNulty-Saxton

    Communications Director

    Maureen is a leading public relations and communications professional with decades of experience in both the public and private sectors. She joined the Research Council as Communications Director in 2023. Before that, Maureen led strategic public relations for statewide clients on behalf of a Detroit-based PR firm. She also founded and directed PR Edge, a Lansing-based public relations firm. Maureen also served in several roles in state government, including heading the press and communications offices for the state departments of Treasury, Management and Budget, and History, Arts & Libraries. She also served as a gubernatorial campaign’s deputy campaign manager and spokeswoman. She earned her B.A. in International Relations from the University of Michigan and serves on the Board of Commissioners of LEPFA as vice chair and the Michigan Nature Association Board of Trustees.

    Latest Research Posts

    Back To Top

    Join our email/text message lists to stay connected with the Citizens Research Council. In addition to a weekly newsletter, you will receive emails notifying you of new publications, event invitations, and related information. We promise not to overburden your inbox.

    Preference(Required)
    How do you prefer to receive information?