Subscribe
  • Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the Citizens Research Council of Michigan is properly cited.

  • Recent Posts

  • Stay informed of new research published and other Citizens Research Council news.
    May 5, 2026

    Article III of Michigan’s Constitution: General Government

    The sixth in a series of 15 papers ahead of November’s ballot question

    Livonia, MI, April 21, 2026 – Citizens Research Council of Michigan today released the sixth in a series of 15 papers providing information to Michigan voters ahead of the November ballot question, Proposal 1, which asks whether Michigan should hold a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con). The series discusses each of the 12 articles of the Michigan Constitution and offers history and other important background information on past Con-Cons.

    The latest paper, Article III – General Government, serves as a catch-all for structural or administrative issues that delegates in 1963 needed to place somewhere in the constitution. It contains provisions that don’t neatly fit into the legislative, executive, or judicial branches. It covers relatively non-controversial subjects, such as the location of the capital, the establishment of the three branches of state government, the provision for a state militia, and the allowance of intergovernmental agreements.

    A constitutional convention could revisit the current prohibition on state involvement in internal improvements and the legislature’s ability to seek advisory opinions from the state supreme court on the constitutionality of pending laws. It could also revisit the reference to a “militia,” a historically rooted but outdated term, given the existence of the National Guard and federal requirements governing National Guard units.

    The Research Council’s Con-Con series aims to provide voters with information to help them decide whether convening a constitutional convention is in Michigan’s best interest. The Citizens Research Council takes no position on whether to call a constitutional convention.

    ###

    Founded in 1916, the Citizens Research Council of Michigan works to improve government in Michigan. The organization provides factual, unbiased, independent information concerning significant issues of state and local government organization, policy, and finance. By delivery of this information to policymakers and citizens, the Research Council aims to ensure sound and rational public policy formation in Michigan. For more information, visit www.crcmich.org.

    Communications Director

    About The Author

    Maureen McNulty-Saxton

    Communications Director

    Maureen is a leading public relations and communications professional with decades of experience in both the public and private sectors. She joined the Research Council as Communications Director in 2023. Before that, Maureen led strategic public relations for statewide clients on behalf of a Detroit-based PR firm. She also founded and directed PR Edge, a Lansing-based public relations firm. Maureen also served in several roles in state government, including heading the press and communications offices for the state departments of Treasury, Management and Budget, and History, Arts & Libraries. She also served as a gubernatorial campaign’s deputy campaign manager and spokeswoman. She earned her B.A. in International Relations from the University of Michigan and serves on the Board of Commissioners of LEPFA as vice chair and the Michigan Nature Association Board of Trustees.

    Article III of Michigan’s Constitution: General Government

    The sixth in a series of 15 papers ahead of November’s ballot question

    Livonia, MI, April 21, 2026 – Citizens Research Council of Michigan today released the sixth in a series of 15 papers providing information to Michigan voters ahead of the November ballot question, Proposal 1, which asks whether Michigan should hold a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con). The series discusses each of the 12 articles of the Michigan Constitution and offers history and other important background information on past Con-Cons.

    The latest paper, Article III – General Government, serves as a catch-all for structural or administrative issues that delegates in 1963 needed to place somewhere in the constitution. It contains provisions that don’t neatly fit into the legislative, executive, or judicial branches. It covers relatively non-controversial subjects, such as the location of the capital, the establishment of the three branches of state government, the provision for a state militia, and the allowance of intergovernmental agreements.

    A constitutional convention could revisit the current prohibition on state involvement in internal improvements and the legislature’s ability to seek advisory opinions from the state supreme court on the constitutionality of pending laws. It could also revisit the reference to a “militia,” a historically rooted but outdated term, given the existence of the National Guard and federal requirements governing National Guard units.

    The Research Council’s Con-Con series aims to provide voters with information to help them decide whether convening a constitutional convention is in Michigan’s best interest. The Citizens Research Council takes no position on whether to call a constitutional convention.

    ###

    Founded in 1916, the Citizens Research Council of Michigan works to improve government in Michigan. The organization provides factual, unbiased, independent information concerning significant issues of state and local government organization, policy, and finance. By delivery of this information to policymakers and citizens, the Research Council aims to ensure sound and rational public policy formation in Michigan. For more information, visit www.crcmich.org.

  • Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the Citizens Research Council of Michigan is properly cited.

  • Recent Posts

  • Stay informed of new research published and other Citizens Research Council news.
    [ctct form="10424" show_title="false"]
    Communications Director

    About The Author

    Maureen McNulty-Saxton

    Communications Director

    Maureen is a leading public relations and communications professional with decades of experience in both the public and private sectors. She joined the Research Council as Communications Director in 2023. Before that, Maureen led strategic public relations for statewide clients on behalf of a Detroit-based PR firm. She also founded and directed PR Edge, a Lansing-based public relations firm. Maureen also served in several roles in state government, including heading the press and communications offices for the state departments of Treasury, Management and Budget, and History, Arts & Libraries. She also served as a gubernatorial campaign’s deputy campaign manager and spokeswoman. She earned her B.A. in International Relations from the University of Michigan and serves on the Board of Commissioners of LEPFA as vice chair and the Michigan Nature Association Board of Trustees.

    Latest Research Posts

    Back To Top

    Join our email/text message lists to stay connected with the Citizens Research Council. In addition to a weekly newsletter, you will receive emails notifying you of new publications, event invitations, and related information. We promise not to overburden your inbox.

    Preference(Required)
    How do you prefer to receive information?